Audience Feedback
This is the audience feedback video, featuring people from the target audience answering questions about our production, and my two personal ancillary tasks. This video is a combination of a face-to-face interview with the camera, and an indirect interview via a Skype call. I will be referring to this video and its content regularly at question 2 and 3.
Question 1
Transcript
Question 2
This is the audience feedback video, featuring people from the target audience answering questions about our production, and my two personal ancillary tasks. This video is a combination of a face-to-face interview with the camera, and an indirect interview via a Skype call. I will be referring to this video and its content regularly at question 2 and 3.
Question 1
Transcript
Introduction
It is important that in our production we follow and
challenge conventions for our chosen media type and genre. Arguably on top of
that, we wanted to make sure we don’t swing too far towards one way or another.
For example, if we were too conventional the audience would potentially find
our production boring and familiar, whereas if it was too challenging the audience
may not understand what’s going on. We wanted to be able to follow Neale’s
theory of repetition and difference with good effect. For this question, I am
going to look over the conventions we followed, the conventions we challenged,
and the conventions we may have developed, and then give my reasons as to why
we made those decisions.
Convention followed
Because the genre we produced was a drama, the fact that
this teaser trailer revolves around people and their morals and emotions made
this a conventional media product. Through my research, I found out that drama
movies tend to have their narratives purely focused around the characters only,
often with moral and social issues bringing the content for the structure. We
felt that this was the most important aspect when it comes to the drama genre,
and therefore it had to stay in. In our case, we had the main character facing
his own moral decisions, and our trailer was shot and edited in such a way
where the audience gets to know the character in a more personal aspect.
Convention followed
Another aspect of our teaser trailer which we felt we should
of kept conventional are the locations at where this trailer was shot. We
wanted to keep the locations recognisable and domestic, to create the effect
that the characters in the trailer are relatable and recognisable to the
audience – a strong characteristic of the drama genre. Therefore, this trailer
was mostly shot inside a normal house, and the exterior locations were seen to
be normal sub-urbs. We could’ve challenged some conventions and gone for a more
abstract location, but my research found that drama productions consistently
stick with domestic locations, and therefore we would risk confusing the
audience if we went for something different.
Convention followed
A final convention that we followed was the structure of the
teaser trailer. More specifically, we chose to follow the Enigma Code. This
means that our production leaves the audience with many questions that are left
open, thanks to intentional gaps left in the narrative of the video. Whilst it
may not be seen as a necessity in a full feature film, our group agreed it was
a vital ingredient on what makes a teaser trailer appealing to the audience,
and it ultimately leads them wanting to watch the main film as they are left
with questions. Without using this convention, we were worried that the
audience would not recognise our production as a teaser trailer.
Convention Challenged
One thing we did challenge in our production in regards to a
drama genre teaser trailer would be our inclusion of abstract concepts within
the narrative. As previously mentioned, dramas tend to stick to something that
is recognisable to the audience, and therefore create verisimilitude. Although
we didn’t want to confuse the audience, our narrative gave us a good
opportunity to challenge the convention by including the abstract idea of lives
being added or taken away depending on how good you were. This is something
that is not normally seen in dramas, since they tend to focus on the human
issues. However, we managed to craft the narrative so that this abstract idea
creates its own human issue (that is to be good and lose lifespan or be bad and
live longer). We therefore feel we successfully managed to challenge this
convention without alienating our audience base.
Convention Developed
Something we decided to develop in our production were the
characters themselves, and their nature. In many ways, our production follows
Propp’s character theory, because we have a villain, a sidekick and a moral
hero. However, we decided to develop this by not actually making our hero that
heroic. In our production, he is seen to be performing bad deeds as he makes
the choice to prioritise his life before other people around him. We chose to
do this because although we wanted to make the characters clear and
distinguishable to the audience, we also on the other hand didn’t want things
to be too stale and recognisable. We felt this development was a good
compromise between the two.
Conclusion
Overall then, it’s very clear to see that we stuck to more
conventions compared to how many we decided to challenge or develop. The main
reason we made this active choice was because our research found that drama
genre productions kept to a fairly similar and arguably safe formula. They are
meant to be representing real life, so there are many important aspects that we
had to keep conventional if we wanted to keep this part of the drama genre.
However, I feel that the changes and developments we did make helps to enhance
the production, and doesn’t alienate the viewer.
Transcript
It’s vitally important that I created an effective and
consistent style between all pieces of my work for the coursework. By having a
poster, magazine cover and main product complement each other, they effectively
come together and create an overall stronger package for the trailer itself. In
the industry, certain stylistic choices such as images or fonts etc will remain
consistent throughout other types of media. For this video, I will be going
over several aspects that allow me to judge just how well my products work with
each other. I may also be referring to my audience feedback where it becomes
necessary, and at the end of each point I will be making a mini evaluation;
there’s always something that could be improved.
One of the biggest aspects to consider if you were to judge
how effective your products are grouped together would be to look at how
consistent the styling is between all three of them. This is to ensure the
audience gets a solid understanding of what your product is trying to convey to
them. If for example you had a very dark product, and then a very bright
product, this could have the potential to confuse the audience. Since our
trailer has distinctively dark themes running through it with the devil, I
decided to follow that through with the magazine cover and the poster. As a
result, the poster is predominantly black with creepy darkness surrounding the
main character, as a form of mysteriousness to the whole situation. The
magazine cover is similarly dark and simple with its colour choices, but I felt
I couldn’t make it as dark because this was a media product that had to sit on
a store shelf and catch the eye of passing people. Therefore, some brightness
and blues have been retained to make it slightly more eye catching. The font
used for the name of the movie is exactly the same on the teaser trailer and
the poster, creating strong links, but it’s differentiates on the magazine
cover, since my research found that magazine producers tend to have their own
artistic style when it comes to fonts. The main character boldly features on
all three products, which is probably the strongest link created. My target
audience research showed that the poster was a lot better at keeping a
consistent style to the trailer than the magazine cover was. Overall, my
magazine cover does not quite stay as consistent with the styling as it perhaps
could if I decided to completely redo the production of it, but the style was
consistent enough to give most people a solid understanding of at least the
gist of the movie. It’s clear to see however that my poster is a much stronger
product in this regard.
Something else to look for in the products I created was how
well each media text I created suggests the genre of my main teaser trailer
production. To suggest the genre effectively, it’s best to keep themes,
colours, and images that strongly relate to our genre on my ancillary tasks, to
create as little confusion between people as possible. Since we were doing a
hybrid of drama-thriller, the lines are a little more blurred than for someone
who was just sticking to one genre, but when you think of the two genres I just
listed, most people think of darkness as the overall theme. With that in mind,
I believe my poster has done a very good job at suggesting those two genres.
The thriller side of things is strongly represented by the darkness – creating
a sense of mystery - and the drama aspect is shown with the more human edge to
the poster – the fact that there are multiple characters in the main
character’s eyes, showing that the dilemma itself is human-based. The magazine
cover is arguably a little vaguer when it comes to suggesting the genre of the
teaser trailer. A quote directly from the trailer about being offered
immortality links to the dilemma side of things and therefore the drama genre
part of the production. The magazine cover is weaker than the poster when it
comes to representing the thriller side of the trailer. The only thing to
suggest that this Dilemma movie has a dark horrific side to it is that the
whole cover has been purposely darkened a little bit in order not to look too
bright and happy. This would almost certainly not quite be enough for general
audiences to pick out a genre though, just from looking at how the cover has
been tinted. The trailer itself mainl y focusses on the dramatic side of things
(since that is our main genre), showing how the dilemma our main character
faces impacts the relationships of others in his life, including two of his
friends and his girlfriend. It also portrays the thriller side of things with
the intense music, and a quick cut of the evil spirits escaping from the main
character’s mouth at the end of the trailer, on top of the hill. Overall, I
believe that my main production and poster do a good job of suggesting the
genre and look very clear with their intentions, but the magazine cover is a
little more open to interpretation from the audience.
The mise en scene that was created with my three productions
actually vary somewhat to create a suitable amount of distinction between them,
and to allow them to suggest the suitable genre. The idea was that when you put
the three media texts together, you got a very complete picture about Dilemma
as a whole. However, that’s not to say that these products are polar opposites,
because as I’ve just shown, they do fit with each other appropriately. The magazine
cover and the poster especially convey the genre of thriller by having a very
mysterious setting. There is nothing in the background, so the audience are
left with questions that need to be answered. This fits in with the spooky,
unknown territories of the thriller genre. On the other hand, the trailer
itself focusses more of the drama side of things. To do this, its setting is
realistic and relatable to pretty much the entire target audience, because it’s
mainly set in a normal suburban house and its surrounding neighbourhood. In
this instance, one can see how my products focus on a different genre aspect of
my main production, but when you put them together, they create the complete
drama-thriller genre that Dilemma is. The use of the same costume can also be
seen throughout all of my products. The main character in my trailer, poster,
and magazine cover is always wearing a normal everyday shirt (though this
cannot be seen in the poster), and the Devil when he appears is wearing his
trademark jacket and typically pulling a stern face in both the trailer and the
poster. The everyday costume gives the impression that this is a normal
everyday young male, and this fits in perfectly for appealing to our target
audience. The devil’s stern face and dark costume is there simply to create a
link between the different media texts. Overall then, the mise en scene that is
linked between my products such as the setting and the costume serves a dual
purpose of creating the necessary links for each other, and also to appeal to
our target audience. For this particular case, I believe that all three of my
products do a good job with this.
The last thing I’ll look at is also one of the most
important, alongside the consistency. How do my ancillary tasks build up the
interest and hype for my main production? Both my poster and my ancillary tasks
have been engineered with the promotion of the main product in mind. The
biggest aspect I had in my mind when I was creating these media texts was the
word ‘mystery’. Mystery allows for me to tease the audience with some mini
internal cliffhanger, and therefore it gives them the urge to see the main
production itself. The teaser trailer idea follows exactly the same concept. I
bought this into reality by making the poster incredibly minimal on purpose. By
only showing the main character and some darkness, on first glance there
doesn’t seem to be anything to take away from it. But if the audience were to
look a little closer at the poster, they would notice the two other characters
with contrasting expressions sitting in each eye. This gives a little bit of
context to the Dilemma name, but nowhere near enough to spoil things. In a
similar fashion, the magazine cover simply features the main character with the
quote ‘If you were offered immortality, would you take it?’ It gives a slight
idea to the audience of what they should expect, but there is nowhere near
enough information for it to become a spoiler. Therefore, by using a method of
mystery and a slight drip feed of information, the two ancillary texts build up
a lot of potential interest for my main production. I asked a question on
whether the poster and magazine cover create more interest for the film, and
while the poster was the clear favourite, they also agreed that the magazine
cover did a good job as well.
Overall, I am happy with how effective the combination has
turned out to be between the three products. However, there is no denying that
the poster is significantly stronger than the magazine cover when it comes to effectively
linking to the main production, and just general aesthetic looks. To improve my
magazine cover and overall make it an even stronger bond between the other two
products, I would perhaps ditch the blue colour for just black and white, and I
would also include another character alongside the main anchorage in order for
it to be a lot clearer on what it’s trying to sell to the audience. With those
changes applied, I believe the connection will be even stronger.
Question 3
Question 3
Transcript
Introduction
Audience feedback is a vital process of a media production,
because it clearly allows me to see where my strong points were, and what could
be improved should I do any future productions. In this video, I shall be going
over what my audience thought of the trailer and the two ancillary tasks, and
then coming to a final conclusion, which will include key areas where I should
improve in the future.
Main Production
To start with, I asked everyone to state what kind of media
product the clip was. All identified it as a teaser trailer, which I deem to be
important. <clip> Though some conventions should be challenged in a
teaser trailer, I believe the overall format should stay conventional and
therefore recognisable to the audience; my group’s trailer has succeeded with
that. This means that I’m following Neale’s theory of repetition and
difference, by repeating the format, but also challenging some other aspects.
My audience weren’t as confident with pinning down what the
genre of the trailer was. <clip> This was somewhat expected, as the genre
was something we decided to challenge in accordance of Neale’s theory. Our
trailer is a hybrid of drama and thriller, but we also had action, fantasy and
sci-fi mentioned. We intended to bring a refreshingly new hybrid genre to the
audience, but my audience feedback shows me that next time I may want to
consider being slightly more conservative and make the genre less mixed and
more obvious, so as to not confuse the audience.
We wanted to make sure our narrative was exciting and
appealing to the audience, but at the same time we wanted to make sure it had
recognisable elements in order to attract them into something they already know
and therefore are comfortable with. Therefore we decided to follow Todorov’s
theory of equilibriums and disequilibriums, though as is the nature of a teaser
trailer, we only showed the disequilibrium. <clip> All of the people I
interviewed managed to explain the narrative of the production very well, which
suggests that the story we have is clear and conventional. I believe that
because we have followed the start of Todorov’s theory for our trailer, it has
made it all a lot clearer and instantly recognisable to the audience.
Characters was something we intentionally wanted to blur and
move away from Propp’s character theory. In our production, the main character
isn’t much of a protagonist (thanks mainly to the bad deeds). However, we
didn’t completely move away from the theory, and that’s why there’s a villain
(creating the binary opposite), and a stereotypical sidekick girlfriend for the
main character. We wanted to see how well the audience picked up on this.
<clip> Some of my audience picked up well on the fact that the main
character isn’t much of a protagonist, whereas others focussed on the fact that
there’s more conventional characters featured, such as the villain and
girlfriend. This mix is what we wanted, as it shows we’ve hit a good spot of
venturing away from Propp’s theory but not completely ignoring it.
Lastly, we wanted to know what could be improved for our
production. Information received here is vital to carry forward to future
projects. <clip> As you can see from the clip shown, the main issue
people had with our main production was the audio and the colours of the video.
We did experience issues with the audio during recording (thanks to a faulty
boom microphone), and they were referring mainly about the colour correction in
the video looking ‘washed out’. This is very valuable information that will be
carried forward to any future productions. We will now be sure to rigorously
test the microphone before use, and to not so heavily colour correct next time.
Ancillary tasks
The most important role of my ancillary tasks was for them
to compliment my main production and get the audience intrigued enough to want
to see the trailer and movie itself. I asked them a question regarding whether
the ancillary tasks make you more interested in the film. <clip> My
audience agreed that both ancillary tasks increased interest for the film, but there
was a definitive unwritten agreement that the poster was better at doing so
than the magazine cover. This suggests that the poster was the stronger and
more conventional product out of my two ancillary tasks, and that my magazine
cover had some areas to improve on.
It was also important that my ancillary tasks were
conventional to the genre of our teaser trailer, otherwise the audience may
have difficulty making the link between the poster or magazine cover and the
trailer itself. So I asked a question regarding whether the poster and magazine
cover helps them with the genre. <clip> Overall, my audience feedback
showed that my poster was a lot more recognisable to the genre when compared to
my magazine cover, which suggests that the poster has a lot more conventional
elements to it regarding the drama-thriller genre. Examples of this could be
the fact that my poster is dark and mysterious, but my magazine cover is
relatively light and could almost be described as cheery to some degree.
Therefore, I may want to consider designing a darker poster to fit the genre
more elegantly for any future production.
Lastly, I wanted to know what could be improved with my
ancillary products. I asked a question regarding what they would improve on my
ancillary products. <clip> From the responses gathered from my audience
feedback, I can clearly see that they believe there is very little improvements
to be made to the poster. Whilst I don’t believe it’s perfect, it does show
that my poster has done a good job of appealing to the audience and conveying
the genre with significant effect. On the other hand, my audience feedback
showed that there were some improvements to be made to my magazine cover;
namely that it doesn’t convey the genre very well, and could therefore have alterations
to it in order for it to be more appealing and conventional. One specifically
mentioned that the magazine cover should have less text in the future. This is
something I should seriously consider if I were to produce a magazine cover in
the future.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the audience feedback was largely positive
about the products I displayed to them. They recognised that my main production
purposefully followed and flouted some conventions and theories, in order to
keep in line with Neale’s theory of repetition and difference. There were
things that were pointed out to me to improve on though; namely the audio and
colour correction. This is valuable information, and will allow me to make a
higher quality production in the future.
When it comes to my ancillary tasks, there is a clear
favourite between my two products. My poster was considered to be far more
conventional and appealing to the eye by all who were questioned, which meant
there are significant improvements to be made to the magazine cover. Without
the audience feedback, I may not have realised this and therefore would not
have been able to improve my quality for next time so effectively.
Question 4
Transcript
Q4 script
It would not be possible to carry out my media coursework
without the extensive use of new media technologies. In this video, I will be
going over some of the key pieces of software and hardware that I used that I
believe played an integral part on making a successful teaser trailer.
Section 1 – Planning and Research – The Internet
The most integral part for both my research and my planning
was using the internet for ideas and material. After using various websites to
gather data and figures in order to achieve a more solid understanding of a
drama genre, I needed a platform to present these findings. One of these
choices was Slideshare, an online embedding platform where users can upload an
unlimited amount of PowerPoint documents and then place them on their website
with no fuss. I used this service on a number of occasions, to display my work
in a clean and easy to read fashion. I really liked using this piece of online
software because of how easy it was to use; this proved to be a key aspect when
it came to the tight deadlines of the coursework. However, the software did not
allow for much customisation to the documents, meaning after a while some of
the work of mine could blend in together and look a little bit plain. It’s
worth mentioning that I did use other platforms for sharing my work such as
Emaze and Prezi, but my blog predominantly consists of Slideshare, and
therefore it could feature more diversity in terms of what new media technology
I endorse, should I improve my blog further for the future. With all that being
said, it allowed me to clearly and concisely present my work – I should just
participate in more customisation options next time.
Section 2 – Shooting – Nikon DSLR
In order for any successful media production to shine, they
need to have the suitable hardware that compliments their hard work. Whilst
last year a compact camera was used, we felt the quality it offered wasn’t
quite up to our standards, so this time we went with a Nikon D3200, which is
owned by Connor. This camera was used for all the footage you see in the
finished teaser trailer. Its lens had the ability to do smooth manual focus
shots <show example> whilst at the same time provided a great depth of
field. This enabled us to do more creative shots such as the focus pull, whilst
maintaining professional-looking footage in order for it to look more authentic
to a real drama teaser trailer. However, the camera didn’t come without its
downsides. For instance, the battery life was fairly poor. We faced several
instances where it cut out early on us, and production had to come to a halt
earlier than we anticipated. This, as one could perhaps imagine, wasted a vast
amount of time and meant we faced going over our deadline. One of the shots we
planned to do was a dolly zoom, but the rough ground meant the camera’s optical
image stabilisation couldn’t iron out all the bumps and create a clean and tidy
shot. Therefore in the future, we may want to use more hardware that will
complement the Nikon further. Overall though, the Nikon did a good job at
creating professional-looking footage; we just had to be aware of its
shortfalls and work around them.
Section 3 – Editing process – Premiere Pro
Now that we had all the footage we wanted, it was time to
put it together in something that followed Neale’s theory of repetition and
difference. In other words, we wanted the audience to feel comfortable with
what they’re watching, but at the same time we wanted to show them something
new and exciting. One of the conventions we felt me must follow in our trailer
is the structure of a teaser trailer; that is to have a build-up and leave the
audience on a cliff hanger. Without this, not only do we risk the situation of
not building up enough excitement for the feature film, but the audience may
not even recognise our production as a teaser trailer.
Another use we had for Premiere was to add the music and titles
in the right area (another cutaway). It’s vitally important that we put these
aspects of our teaser trailer in the right places in order to create the
dramatic effect we desired – to follow the convention from the drama genre. A
good thing our group found out about using Premiere is that it offered a wide
range of tools for us to fine-tune our video to exactly how we wanted it.
Additionally, even if Premiere didn’t have the tools we wanted, it communicated
well with other Adobe programs such as After Effects and Speedgrade in order to
make things like the graphical title and colour correction easy to transfer. On
the other hand though, I also found I had a big learning curve with Premiere,
which did interrupt how quickly and efficiently we produced our content. My
personal issue was that I have already mastered one piece of editing software,
so it took a fair amount of time to remap in my mind where the shortcut keys
are, and where some of the tools are within the drop down menus. Therefore, I
believe I would’ve been more productive if I had my software of choice to use
at school. With all that being said, Premiere was a very capable piece of
software, and would be very ideal for future projects once I gathered more
experience with it.
Section 4 – Ancillary – Photoshop CS6
To create both the magazine cover and the movie poster that
complements our teaser trailer, I made full use of Adobe InDesign. But before I
could use that application effectively, it was vital that I used Photoshop.
<Show example of camera raw, quick selection etc> As you can see, this
program has several powerful tools used to make a yellow picture with shadows
into a high quality image, ready to be on a large movie poster or on the front
cover of a magazine. The great thing about using Photoshop was the vast amount of
power and flexibility it gave me when it came to manipulating images and their
surrounds. Things like the lighting effects gave me an accurate and
professional-looking image that no other software could give me. Since it’s the
default picture editing software used throughout many industries, I had gained
a solid prior grip with this software, and therefore it was fairly simple to
operate. On the other hand, I found that this wasn’t a fully reliable program,
with frequent crashes that caught me out on a couple of occasions when I hadn’t
saved beforehand. I also initially had trouble with the lighting effects. This
was fixed, but it didn’t help my productivity. Overall though, I am very happy
with how using Photoshop enhanced my images to a whole new level, and I believe
there is no other software out there that would achieve what I desired. Without
Photoshop, I believe my end products for the ancillary wouldn’t have looked
professional, appealing, or complimentary.
Overall, it is clear to see that the new media technology
that was used throughout my coursework significantly enhanced our visions. No
piece of software or hardware was perfect, but they yielded far more positives
than negatives.
No comments:
Post a Comment